Search for: "Liriano v. Hobart Corp."
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2023, 7:55 pm
In Liriano v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 1996); Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
A typical critique of the problem of overwarning in the general (non-drug/device) product liability context occurred in Liriano v Hobart Corp., in consideration of the “open and obvious” limitation on the duty to warn:[W]hen a warning would have added nothing to the user’s appreciation of the danger, no duty to warn exists as no benefit would be gained by requiring a warning. [read post]