Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 16 July 1998" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The echo chamber is being sustained by figures such as Mike Lindell, chief executive of MyPillow, who says he has spent $16 million in the effort. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
Mr Watson advised that in the event of him receiving instructions to do so, he was willing to excise from the file certain material in order to assist the police inquiry. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 727 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1998) ................16 Schwab v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
There are 29 posts (not counting this one) that fall under the label "removal" on our topic list. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
 Id.at 752.The Hospital filed a petition for review with this Court, raising three issues. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Cause No. 16-0854) and is one of two petitions for review scheduled to be heard at the University of Houston's law school on Friday, September 15, 2017. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
So the populations of case opinions that can be found in repositories such as Westlaw, Lexis, Casemaker, Justia, or Google Scholar, are not a representative sample of the universe of cases.And as for the precedent-setting cases in the state supreme court, they were and continue to be hand-picked because courts of last resort exercise discretionary review and their active docket (granted petitions are denominated "causes" in the SCOTX lingo) is anything but a random… [read post]