Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 18 February 1999" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Titus also ordered quarterly environmental inspections of the Branch Avenue rail yard during an 18-month probationary period. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Long Island Family Lawyer said the HPD has answered the petition alleging that Petitioner has no valid claim for family succession rights or any other valid lease rights to the Apartment HPD further alleges, without elaboration, that "28 RCNY §3-02 governs petitioner's application for succession rights and §3-18 Is not applicable. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
On April 2, 2003, Lynn filed a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship and Request for Temporary Orders. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The petitioner appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied review without providing any reasons for the denial. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The CSSA provides for no other option and vests the court with no discretion to order payment in the other direction. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm by John Floyd
The appeals court issued a limited remand order on May 18, 2015, allowing Syed an opportunity to petition the trial court to reopen the post-conviction proceedings to have further proceedings on the alibi issue. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
On February 9, 2007, Southwest Homes filed a Petition for Foreclosure in Rem against the Lindseys under the 2006 mortgage. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
 Member Walsh dissenting, found that the majority failed to properly apply the relevant factors under Master Slack, and would find that the employee petition was tainted and, consequently, that the Respondent's April 18 withdrawal of recognition was unlawful. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
” CRST's Petition in Support of the Motion (“CRST Fees Brief”) (docket no. 282-22), at 5. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
On February 5, 2009, plaintiff served the state with supplemental interrogatories and document demands. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
  The following year, Congress passed 18 U.S.C. [read post]