Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 24 February 1999" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 7:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Westchester County Family Lawyer said review of documents filed supplementing the adoption petition indicates that while petitioners were found to be qualified adoptive parents pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 115-d by order of Monroe County Surrogate's Court dated 1/13/94, at the time this petition was filed in the Family Court on June 10, 1999 the petitioners were no longer certified as qualified adoptive parents. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A review of documents filed supplementing the adoption petition indicates that while petitioners were found to be qualified adoptive parents pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 115-d by order of Monroe County Surrogate's Court dated 1/13/94, at the time this petition was filed in the Family Court on June 10, 1999 the petitioners were no longer certified as qualified adoptive parents. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The CSSA provides for no other option and vests the court with no discretion to order payment in the other direction. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Then, on June 30, 2015, Syed filed a Motion to Re-Open Post-Conviction Proceedings in the Circuit Court, followed by a Supplement to the motion on August 24, 2015. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
  A further hearing took place on 2nd June 2010, listed as Re X, at which the order was continued. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm by John Floyd
The appeals court issued a limited remand order on May 18, 2015, allowing Syed an opportunity to petition the trial court to reopen the post-conviction proceedings to have further proceedings on the alibi issue. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rupeon June 24, 2014 that eliminated the common law cause of action for shareholder oppression,[1] Holland filed an emergency memorandum with Judge Davidson informing him of the Ritchie opinion. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
  A Board majority adopted the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) by failing to provide the Union with information requested on February 11, 2002. [read post]