Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED August 19, 2003" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 20, July 19, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm by FDABlog HPM
§ 156(d)(1) was June 23, 2003, then [sic] 60 day period ended on August 21, 2003, thus rendering the submission of the PTE Application on August 19, 2003, timely within the meaning of § 156(d)(1). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
On April 2, 2003, Lynn filed a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship and Request for Temporary Orders. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  For a full background on the issue, see my previous post from August 2009. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Brandes  titled "Navigating the Matrimonial Preliminary Conference So You Don’t Sink the Ship". appears in the New York State Bar Association Family Law Review, Winter 2020, Vol. 52, No. 1. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm by John Floyd
The appeals court issued a limited remand order on May 18, 2015, allowing Syed an opportunity to petition the trial court to reopen the post-conviction proceedings to have further proceedings on the alibi issue. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
Wall also flagged that there appeared to be a concerning suggestion in some of the case files reviewed by him in the preparation of his report, that it may be safe to order contact where domestic violence has been perpetrated on the mother but not the child. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
  The trial court granted the motion, but the Court of Appeal vacated the trial court’s order. [read post]