Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED August 5, 2003"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
That police report is a two-page report dated March 24, 1983, at 5:30 PM.1 The first page lists the complainant, the date and the time of the incident being reported. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Thus, the “Key Terms” listed in Mr. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
In that regard, the guardian ad litem reviewed the account and the petition in support, reviewed the objections, reviewed documents regarding kinship and investigated kinship issues, reviewed correspondence, prepared for and attended the kinship hearing, read the transcript from the kinship hearing, and prepared the guardian ad litem report. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
For publication opinions today (5): In 600 Land Development, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
On July 26, 2006, Bookout filed a petition for a protective order under section 15657.03 of the Elder Abuse Act, seeking to have Nielsen excluded from the Laguna Woods residence. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
No. 405 on August 16, 2006 giving DSS thirty days from the date of the decision and order to do so. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 pm
No. 405 on August 16, 2006 giving DSS thirty days from the date of the decision and order to do so. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
The trial court explicitly denied Sekumade's motion to transfer venue on August 2, 2010. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
" James's sons appeared and filed an answer generally denying the allegations in Harris County's petition. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
For a full background on the issue, see my previous post from August 2009. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
After careful review, we vacate and remand the trial court’s order for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
(Filing No. 320 at 5.) [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Further, “the court shall pro rate each parent’s share of reasonable health care expenses not reimbursed or paid by insurance ... in the same proportion as each parent’s income is to the combined parental income” (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b] [c][5][v]). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
The court further ordered that Deborah take nothing on all her claims against Robert and Bailey, incorporating its prior summary judgment orders. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
I hope that further proceedings in the case fix the court’s pretty obvious error–but that fix won’t come from the California Supreme Court, which unfortunately denied the petition for review. 9) Musk destroys Twitter. [read post]
