Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED February 14, 2012."
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
After the application languished for 19 months, Custodia filed a complaint with the Wyoming District Court seeking an order to compel the Federal Reserve Board and the FRBKC to grant Custodia a master account. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Disclosure #3: Justice Alito rescheduled Dobbs while waiting for Justice Ginsburg's vacancy to be filled In March 2021, I observed that there was some unusual docket activity with regard to the Dobbs petition: On June 15, 2020, a petition for certiorari was filed in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:30 pm
February 14, 2022 – GWG Buys Time with Letter to Investors Those investors who were hoping to see a February interest payment from GWG Holdings may be sorely disappointed today. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
The prior petition requested review of a limited number of Chinese companies while the current Petition requests review of all imports coming from Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia that use Chinese components. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Austin filed two complaints: one elections complaint about his residency and a campaign finance complaint about the address McKean listed on his candidate affidavit. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Burris paid Hutchinson $157,500 between February 2014 and November 2016. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
It further found that Family Court erred in vacating a December 2019 amended order of custody and dismissing both of petitioner’s Family Ct Act article 6 petitions. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
It further found that Family Court erred in vacating a December 2019 amended order of custody and dismissing both of petitioner’s Family Ct Act article 6 petitions. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
The husband denied all allegations of adulterous behavior in a reply dated February 1, 2019.The husband moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing that counterclaim under CPLR 3212. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
The Government had argued that Section 1346 should criminalize schemes involving fiduciaries’ undisclosed conflicts of interest, defined as “the taking of official action by [a public official or private] employee that furthers his own undisclosed financial interests while purporting to act in the interests of those to whom he owes a financial duty. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
The MRI was performed on February 5, 2019. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
The Debtors Met Holdings filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 11, 2020, followed by the other Debtors on February 12, 2020. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Since filing the petition, however, Mr. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
Custody was later resolved through a consent order dated 23 February 2015. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
Should you fail to comply with a Civil Investigative Demand, the government will likely file a petition in Federal District Court seeking judicial enforcement of the request.[9] As the government’s utilization of Civil Investigative Demands has increased, we have seen a number of challenges raised by recipients. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
So the populations of case opinions that can be found in repositories such as Westlaw, Lexis, Casemaker, Justia, or Google Scholar, are not a representative sample of the universe of cases.And as for the precedent-setting cases in the state supreme court, they were and continue to be hand-picked because courts of last resort exercise discretionary review and their active docket (granted petitions are denominated "causes" in the SCOTX lingo) is anything but a random… [read post]
