Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 16, 2001."
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
Each party waived any interest in the other's law license and released or discharged any debts or further claims against the other. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The Board denied her petition for review as untimely filed, finding no credible medical evidence regarding her condition. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
§§ 1–16. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Cause No. 16-0854) and is one of two petitions for review scheduled to be heard at the University of Houston's law school on Friday, September 15, 2017. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Specifically, Texas petitioned the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
§§ 1–16. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
On 9 June 2000, the hearing was then fixed for 15 and 16 March 2001. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Vermont Ski Area Ordered to Restore Wetlands. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Vermont Ski Area Ordered to Restore Wetlands. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab filed a timely notice of appeal of the circuit court's Order on June 25, 2008.1 STANDARD OF REVIEW Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(d) provides that adefendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on postconviction 1 Exhibits listed in the brief are the exhibits submitted with the Motion to Vacate filed with the lower court on June20, 2008. [read post]
