Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED July 17, 2007"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 9:04 pm
In addition, the order includes this paragraph: "FURTHER ORDERED that by September 13, 2007, respondent [the government] file a revised certified index to the record, as record is defined in Bismullah v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 6:27 pm
Therefore, we will not be initiating a further status review in response to this petition. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:59 am
BACKGROUND: On July 9, 2007 (72 FR 37346), the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said on 17 June 2007, seven months after executing her will, the decedent, AB, died. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
McCollum, 969 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 2007); Jones v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
Law Judge Mary Miller Cracraft issued her decision Jan. 17, 2003. *** Datwyler Rubber and Plastics, Inc. (11-CA-21185; 350 NLRB No. 58) Marion, SC Aug. 13, 2007. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:27 pm
A New York Probate Laywer said on 17 June 2007, seven months after executing her will, the decedent, AB, died. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
If you choose to file the I-765 and/or I-131 separately after July 30, 2007, you must also submit a copy of your I-797C, Notice of Action receipt as evidence of the filing of an I-485. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 1:22 am
A further motion toquash deals with subpoenas directed to Assistant AttorneysGeneral Snurkowski and Nunnelley, who are counsel in this case.A previous subpoena to AAG Nunnelley was quashed earlier in thiscase. 2 The State's petition was filed on August 10, 2007, and thisCourt's order was issued on August 20, 2007. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
July 3, 2009 - Opinions ReleasedTEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDERS JUDGES TO EXPLAIN AND JUSTIFY WHY THEY GRANTED NEW TRIALS [in cases in which tort claim defendants had prevailed with the jury]"In the Interest of Justice" - a common label for judicial discretion in that regard and in others - will no longer pass muster as a sufficient ground. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The State filed a memorandum on July 26, 2007 titled AThe Issues Raised in Prior 1 Proceedings,@ which accurately quotes the appellate courts= description of the issues which wereraised on direct appeal, in state postconviction proceedings and on federal review, and theirdisposition. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
The Reply Memorandum concludes: "For the reasons set forth above, this Court should grant the relief requested in the Verified Petition and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
No. 01-17-00877-CV. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
-Corpus Christi July 17, 2014) (mem. op.) [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The government and Jupiter have been locked in battle since 2007, when the federal government claimed in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
In 2007 the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
LEXIS 181 , petition for writ of review filed 8/28/2023 W.C.A.B. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
December 21, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
