Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 17, 2003"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The "listed residence" was shown as 1225 E. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
This list does not attempt to include all important decisions of those two courts that were rendered in 2022. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
The Enforcement Bureau released a Public Notice on June 17, 2021 seeking comments on the matter. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
Failure to do so will result in an immediate order of relief for the petitioning creditor(s). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
-Fort Worth June 29, 2017, no pet.) [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., ARB No. 15-030, ALJ No. 2014-FRS-59 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order Dismissing Complaint PDF Summary: The ARB dismissed the Complainant’s administrative FRSA complaint because it received notice that the Complainant had filed a de novo action in the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
On April 2, 2003, Lynn filed a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship and Request for Temporary Orders. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
There are 29 posts (not counting this one) that fall under the label "removal" on our topic list. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
Id.at 752.The Hospital filed a petition for review with this Court, raising three issues. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
The Company responded to the FDA on June 17, 2010. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
EPA in 2002 for violating the federal Clean Water Act, has been working under the time table of a June 2003 consent decree, which required it to hire qualified top management, create plans, accurately map the systems and make specific improvements. [read post]
