Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 18, 2002." Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy opinion filed February 22, and belatedly ordered published on March 25, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging the EIR for a mixed use business and residential project (the “5M Project”) on 4 acres in downtown San Francisco. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
Along with their petitions, the Debtors filed the declaration of Robert D. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
DSS filed its verified answer to the petition on September 14, 2006, after the court issued Dec. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 pm
The worksheet bears the date of March 12, 1997 and lists the date of application as April 18, 1996. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
Introduction On February 20, 2019, the Debtor filed a Chapter 7 case that was later converted to Chapter 13 by Agreed Order entered June 26, 2019 (Doc. 16). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Titus also ordered quarterly environmental inspections of the Branch Avenue rail yard during an 18-month probationary period. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
The state has filed an application to stay the 6th Circuit’s mandate, because the 180-day period ends June 13. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Companion animals are not listed, nor provided in, the text of the Automatic Orders. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., ARB No. 15-030, ALJ No. 2014-FRS-59 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order Dismissing Complaint PDF          Summary: The ARB dismissed the Complainant’s administrative FRSA complaint because it received notice that the Complainant had filed a de novo action in the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
There are 29 posts (not counting this one) that fall under the label "removal" on our topic list. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]