Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 28, 2006" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm
On 10 April 2008, G filed another consent to change attorney, dated 28 March 2008. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
Locke issued his decision April 15, 2003. *** Firstline Transportation Security, Inc. (17-RC-12354; 347 NLRB No. 40) Kansas City, MO June 28, 2006. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:27 pm
On 10 April 2008, G filed another consent to change attorney, dated 28 March 2008. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm by OK Blawg Editor - James Dee Graves
LEXIS 4949 (U.S., June 26, 2006)PRIOR HISTORY: AN APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
It further noted that any improvements on the property would be subject to future CEQA review. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
There are 29 posts (not counting this one) that fall under the label "removal" on our topic list. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Accordingly, the petitions for review were granted and the orders vacated. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in an action for administrative mandate. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]