Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED March 16, 2004"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 10:08 am
The US Supreme Court on Monday denied a petition for certiorari to review a ruling from the Ninth Circuit that ordered the Union Pacific Railroad and others to pay part of a $16.5 million cleanup of a California Superfund site. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest An article by Joel R. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:56 am
" The company filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm
Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Slip Op. 07335) the parties were married in 2004. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm
Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
¶ 12, 16. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
After almost 30 years of marriage, the parties separated in 2002 and stipulated in 2004 that the cut-off date for determining the value of marital assets would be September 1, 2004. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
No. 18-0626 (briefing on the merits requested 11/16/2018). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
An administrative judge upheld the decision, stating that the decision would become final on June 21, 2004, unless a petition for review was filed. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
On March 10, 2011, this Court issued an order abating Sekumade's petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b) to allow Judge Touchy to reconsider Judge Ellisor's rulings on Sekumade's motion to transfer venue and Build by Owner's motion to compel and motion to strike Sekumade's pleadings. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
§§ 1–16. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
No. 405 on August 16, 2006 giving DSS thirty days from the date of the decision and order to do so. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
Dec. 16, 2010). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
After careful review, we vacate and remand the trial court’s order for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
