Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED March 17, 2009" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 4:09 pm
Angelin, 172 Cal.App.4th 133 (March 17, 2009)) regarding the sufficiency of a trade secret identification statement. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am by smtaber
December 21, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy opinion filed February 22, and belatedly ordered published on March 25, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging the EIR for a mixed use business and residential project (the “5M Project”) on 4 acres in downtown San Francisco. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:13 am by S2KM Limited
Filed with the Court on March 1, 2012, Bing's ELNY Affidavit supports the Superintendent's Petition for Liquidation, the proposed Restructuring Agreement and the Reply Memorandum referenced above and summarized below. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
For instance, an individual from India with an advanced degree has a Priority Date of September 17, 2009; the DOS is currently servicing cases with Priority Dates of September 5, 2005. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
On February 9, 2007, Southwest Homes filed a Petition for Foreclosure in Rem against the Lindseys under the 2006 mortgage. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
There are 29 posts (not counting this one) that fall under the label "removal" on our topic list. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  Footnote 1 This case was filed prior to the 2009 addition of section 51.016 to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code expanding state court interlocutory review of certain FAA arbitration matters. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
 Stoutjesdyk Dairy LLC, 3265 460th Street, Maurice, Iowa, did not have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit at the time of an April 2009 inspection by EPA Region 7, according to a consent agreement and final order filed today in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]