Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED March 20, 2012." Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm by Florian Mueller
But the anonymous requester(s) kept fighting for a more comprehensive review and filed a petition. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
Elsevier filed a review petition to overturn the sealing order. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
Along with their petitions, the Debtors filed the declaration of Robert D. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The discrepancy pertained to a lump-sum loan/bonus payment of $350,000 that the husband received up front in January 2012. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
I will simply list those reasons due to the age of this case and that we are remanding it for further consideration. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Burr Asks Senate Ethics Committee for Review of His Stock Sales Stamford Advocate – John Wagner, Michelle Ye Hee Lee, John Swain, and Karoun Demirjian (Washington Post) | Published: 3/20/2020 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:45 pm
A list summarizing all of the transfers made by them was prepared and sent to both co-executors. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by David Phillips, Kelly Berkell
The Court reviewed only the first two statutory elements for listing. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
The forensic examination of [his] computer further revealed that, on June 17, 2012, [he] created a folder on his computer which he labeled `docs. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Each party waived any interest in the other's law license and released or discharged any debts or further claims against the other. [read post]