Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 13, 2000."
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
I, § 13, Fla. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
On December 13, 2011, the magistrate issued her report and recommended that the court: (1) deny BOA’s petition to set aside the ARB’s final order; and (2) grant the OFCCP’s motion for summary judgment (95 EPD ¶44,370). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
On December 13, 2011, the magistrate issued her report and recommended that the court: (1) deny BOA’s petition to set aside the ARB’s final order; and (2) grant the OFCCP’s motion for summary judgment (95 EPD ¶44,370). [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
The Bank filed suit against Gattenby on September 13, 2017, for breach of contract and account stated seeking damages in the amount of $16,935.87 and requesting $3,000 in attorney's fees.On October 4, 2017, Gattenby received service of citation. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Sep. 13, [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
The parties have filed 234 exhibits and more than 110 declarations alleging facts and providing references to inform the Judge’s consideration of these issues. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In October 2019, the mother filed a petition seeking custody of the child. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
The CSSA provides for no other option and vests the court with no discretion to order payment in the other direction. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Cause No. 16-0854) and is one of two petitions for review scheduled to be heard at the University of Houston's law school on Friday, September 15, 2017. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The applicant filed a counter-claim alleging that the council had instructed further repairs that had damaged his property. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Attached to Midland Funding's motion for new trial was the affidavit of Brian Staley, one of five attorneys listed as counsel for Midland Funding on its petition. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Attached to Midland Funding's motion for new trial was the affidavit of Brian Staley, one of five attorneys listed as counsel for Midland Funding on its petition. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Vermont Ski Area Ordered to Restore Wetlands. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Vermont Ski Area Ordered to Restore Wetlands. [read post]
