Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 16, 2003"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
September 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Disposition of prior petition to terminate mother parental rights which was favorable to the biological mother, did not preclude the findings of extraordinary circumstances in later kinship guardianship proceeding. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
For example, the September 2, 1983, entry stated: I received a phone call from Mrs. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The Board denied her petition for review as untimely filed, finding no credible medical evidence regarding her condition. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
DSS filed its verified answer to the petition on September 14, 2006, after the court issued Dec. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
They petitioned the Tenth Circuit to review that decision. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
According to husband, the parties believed the account was valued at $5.4 million as of September 1, 2004, the valuation date for marital assets. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
" James's sons appeared and filed an answer generally denying the allegations in Harris County's petition. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
E.g., In re Blaine Richards & Co., 16 B.R. 362 (Bankr. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
The Commission intends to undertake a comprehensive review of the bicycle regulations at a future point to determine how these regulations might be further amended to address the changes that have taken place.In the Federal Register of November 1, 2010 (75 FR 67043), we issued a proposed rule that would amend 16 CFR part 1512. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Senate candidates have a political résumé with a contentious item: filing or actively supporting one of the failed lawsuits that furthered former President Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was rife with fraud. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 pm
A Nassau Probate Lawyer said that, DSS filed its verified answer to the petition on September 14, 2006, after the court issued Dec. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
At a hearing on September 2, 2010, the trial court granted Build by Owner's motion to enforce and ordered Sekumade to pay $13,000 to Build by Owner's counsel by 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 2010, ordered Sekumade to complete forty hours of community service, and struck Sekumade's pleadings. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Ramirez, No. 02-16-00059-CV, 2017 WL 929527, (Tex. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Does filing a mandamus petition automatically stay the trial court order at issue? [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Specifically, Texas petitioned the U.S. [read post]
