Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 17, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Senate candidates have a political résumé with a contentious item: filing or actively supporting one of the failed lawsuits that furthered former President Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was rife with fraud. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Northwest Environmental Defense Center (“NEDC”) filed suit in September 2006 alleging that the [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
The Reply Memorandum concludes: "For the reasons set forth above, this Court should grant the relief requested in the Verified Petition and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
We reverse the trial court's judgment and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.BackgroundAccording to the Bank's original petition, Gattenby opened a credit account with the Bank on or about October 11, 2013. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
California State Lands Commission (September 17, 2015, A141696, A141697) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Dorta was . . . able to circumvent the cell phone password on September 25, 2012. . . . [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This year-end update provides an overview of the major developments in federal and state securities litigation since our last update in September 2022: The Supreme Court is set to hear a blockbuster case that will shape whether and how shareholders can establish standing to bring claims under Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act when a company sells its shares in a direct listing. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
— Matthew Brown, Associated Press, September 21, 2009 Federal Judge rules that because grizzly bears are facing the combined pressures of climate change, hunters and lax protections, in and around Yellowstone National Park they are going back on the threatened species list under a federal court order. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
No. 01-17-00877-CV. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06170(2d Dept.,2021) the parties September 6, 2013, a stipulation regarding child support was incorporated in to their February 7, 2014, judgment of divorce but did not merge. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
In 2013, the plaintiff commenced the action for a divorce. [read post]
