Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 28, 2011." Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2014, 6:45 pm
On November 7, 2011, counsel wrote regarding payment of his invoice and request for the estate file. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
Answer #5 The USCIS has not provided an updated on the receipt of H-1B CAP subject petitions since September 9, 2011. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The Board denied her petition for review as untimely filed, finding no credible medical evidence regarding her condition. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:33 am
A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2011, and a Final Rule was published on August 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
To review our prior annual reviews, click here: 2012; 2011; 2010; 2009; 2008. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
They hope to comply with the court order before October 1, 2011. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Companion animals are not listed, nor provided in, the text of the Automatic Orders. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm by admin
In a three-page order signed yesterday,  Chambers granted CONSOL subsidiary Fola Coal’s request for the extension, giving the company authority to continue to operate “pending further order of the court. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
The next day, on December 10, 2011, at the request of Dean of Students David Baum, the LawClosed list was disabled. . . .Enjaian v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
WildEarth Guardians filed a lawsuit in September challenging Utah’s rules, specifically a provision that the group says lets facilities exceed emissions limits when pollution-control equipment breaks down. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am by MOTP
At a hearing on September 2, 2010, the trial court granted Build by Owner's motion to enforce and ordered Sekumade to pay $13,000 to Build by Owner's counsel by 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 2010, ordered Sekumade to complete forty hours of community service, and struck Sekumade's pleadings. [read post]