Search for: "List v. Pennsylvania"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:54 am
Bierly v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. , 212 A.D.3d 126, 179 N.Y.S.3d 455 (3d Dept. 2022) [see § 124.02 n. 33], the Board’s decision to remove a medical practitioner from a list of authorized medical providers was found not to be arbitrary. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm
Hanrahan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am
Savoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
In the case of Baigis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
Was “Widener” in Pennsylvania or Delaware?) [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
Was “Widener” in Pennsylvania or Delaware?) [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
Was “Widener” in Pennsylvania or Delaware?) [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
See id., at 1a–114a.The Colorado Supreme Court accordingly ordered Secre-tary Griswold not to “list President Trump’s name on the2024 presidential primary ballot” or “count any write-invotes cast for him. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
New Issued Cases There were two defamation (libel and slander) claims issued in the Media and Communications List in the last week. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
None of these listed laws applied to the National Guard, which was equipped with machine guns and bombs. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
(It is listed on the Social Science Research Network as “forthcoming” this year in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.) [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case captioned Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
