Search for: "Little v State" Results 61 - 80 of 26,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Thus, today's unanimous decision to that effect comes as little surprise. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Perhaps because the Laken Riley Act has little chance of passing the Senate or becoming law, there has been little public analysis of its details, although its initial passage by the House was covered by major media such as the New York Times and CNN . [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Daniel Deacon
The descriptive account also suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in Oil States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Elenis, of a First Amendment objection to state public accommodations laws that the Court avoided in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]