Search for: "Little v. Gillette" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 8:14 am by Bart Torvik
 Anyone who thinks the "platinum coin" solution to the Debt Ceiling is obviously legal needs to read Bloomington Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:05 am
Gillette and P&G. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:11 am by Bart Torvik
The Supreme Court today issued another opinion (American Express v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
") and Po-Jen Yap (""Honestly, neither Celine nor Gillette is defensible", a little bit of heresy for those who think the European Court of Justice knows more about honest business practices than trade mark owners do). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:09 am by Bart Torvik
Fan(s)™ of my Platinum Coin series surely knew where I stood on the latest challenge to Obamacare, King v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:28 am by Bart Torvik
This is background for an interesting little order by the always-entertaining Judge Milton Shadur of the Northern District of Illinois in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm by Bart Torvik
He was not changing his ruling.Which brings me to the Seventh Circuit fiasco known as Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:33 pm by Adam Gillette
:There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Kiran Bhat
” Briefly: The Associated Press reports that the Court denied cert. in the case of Mississippi death row inmate Roger Gillett. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
With all the crazy things happening now, it seems a little frivolous, even irresponsible, to be obsessing about the minutiae of the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Gillette Co., 87 Ill. 2d 7, 428 N.E.2d 478, 484 (Ill. 1981) ("the present case is predicated upon a series of essentially identical transactions"); Avery v. [read post]