Search for: "Little v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Several of his attempts to relate the history of dust diseases were little more than recycled litigation reports, previously filed in various cases, with footnotes added. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Jones, 227 N.C. 402, 405, 42 S.E.2d 465, 467 (1947). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Jones. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Clergy Discipline and Confidentiality: Gadd v Peers. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:10 pm
But if you’re willing to open your mind a little and consider, for example, some videos you might see circulating on TikTok and Facebook, then you might end up agreeing with proven truth-hound Alex Jones that there just might be something to all this. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
“I think that (the city) should do a little bit more. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
“I think that (the city) should do a little bit more. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:41 am
Case in point: Jones v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
“I think that (the city) should do a little bit more. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
Shona Jones and Muireann Quigley argued in ‘Preventing lawful and decent burial: resurrecting dead offences’ (2016) Legal Studies 36 (2) 354-374 that there is little justification or need for criminalising the prevention of burial per se, that the historical context of the need to regulate the disposal of corpses is no longer relevant, and that though acts which intentionally impeded the administration of justice are rightly criminal, other offences already deal more… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The Justice Department leaves little doubt why they pursued Baker. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
Therefore, Neville is of little persuasive value to this court. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
