Search for: "Little v. NATIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES"
Results 41 - 60
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:06 am
We’ve long called for pro-privacy reforms to the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), the outdated law that provides little protection for “cloud” content stored by third-party service providers. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
” Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
Department of Homeland Security National Protection and Programs Directorate. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:53 am
” Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:29 pm
Circuit heard the case of Mozilla v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:30 pm
As discussed in Supreme Beef Processors v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
” Constitutional law does little to alleviate concern. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
While holding them to be industry even when run without profit motive, Justice Iyer had reasoned that research throws up discoveries and inventions that are often sold and patented and are valuable contributions to the wealth of the nation. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
While holding them to be industry even when run without profit motive, Justice Iyer had reasoned that research throws up discoveries and inventions that are often sold and patented and are valuable contributions to the wealth of the nation. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
In a well written and compelling dissent, Judge Barkett cited the tradition of recognizing the “great public policy of preserving [seamen as an] important class of citizens for the commercial service and maritime defence of the nation. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
There should be little doubt that the relationship between the Chinese security services and Chinese industry is fundamentally different than in the United States and not hindered in any meaningful way by legal limitations or privacy concerns. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:47 pm
Forest Service v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Are we focusing too much on auditing and too little on platforms’ internal risk assessments, which are a precondition to the audits? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
Simply stated, in the private club industry, a little “discrimination” can go a long way in avoiding potential lawsuits based on discrimination! [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:10 pm
Dep't of Health & Human Services and granted the preliminary injunction requested by the Plaintiffs. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:44 am
Unlike Bolger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:01 pm
The issue was decided in favor of the government by a Federal District Court in Texas in Texas Food Industry Association v. [read post]
