Search for: "Little v. Strange (PANEL)"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
And that's what makes Delaware's whole argument so strange. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
A little math shows why the government’s request matters. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Hanen quickly enjoined the 2014 initiatives, and that ruling was validated twice by divided Fifth Circuit panels. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
A very similar case is pending before a three-judge-panel in Georgia – Georgia State Conf. of the NAACP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:28 pm
In the process, Gorsuch does this strange performance. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
Because much of the attention has focused on attributing violations to the parties and individuals in question, little has been paid to the fact that States and NSAGs also tend to show a degree of compliance with certain IHL rules in conflict settings. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
For instance, the Microsoft v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 8:56 pm
Writing for the panel, Judge Kim Wardlaw said that the de minimis concept is “properly used to analyze whether so little of a copyrighted work has been copied that the allegedly infringing work is not substantially similar to the copyrighted work and is thus non-infringing. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:01 pm
Lately it occurs to me / What a long, strange trip it’s been . . . . [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:29 am
MannKind raised almost $61 million in the offering, so HCW earned a little over $3 million, equaling 5 percent of the gross proceeds. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Why this strange reversal here? [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
On appeal, the panel stayed the injunction based on a flawed reading of Diocese. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
