Search for: "Little v. Strange (PANEL)" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm
  For me, anyway.It's a neat little habeas case. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:18 am by Larry
There is little law on the implementation of NAFTA panel decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am by Terry Hart
” The Legal Interests of an Author The court gets so much incorrect in so little time. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:19 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
But, it is worth discussing the importance of FCC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm by Richard Santalesa
In light of the previous Brekka holding case, the prior Ninth Circuit panel in US v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:13 pm by Corey McGehee
  As Dick Clark presciently recognized on American Bandstand, the song is “a little unusual, a little strange,” and so is the dispute in Everly v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Josh Blackman
Katyal found it strange that the President would have opined on the title of the order. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
 And he sets up his classroom furniture so there's a nice little hidden alcove.Mind you, what I've just said could potentially apply equally to lots of teachers I know. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:27 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman Ira Arnstein is well-known to most IP professors as the named plaintiff in the copyright classic Arnstein v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Hanen quickly enjoined the 2014 initiatives, and that ruling was validated twice by divided Fifth Circuit panels. [read post]