Search for: "Little v. Walker"
Results 101 - 120
of 537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2022, 5:54 am
In Walker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:22 am
The named plaintiffs were hired as interns and did a little bit of this and a little bit of that for the company, i.e., handling publicity, taking out the trash, photocopying, making deliveries, and so on. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm
The decision on the stay came out after a morning of online reports describing a growing line of hopeful couples congregating at San Francisco City Hall.From Point of Law:Judge Walker refused to grant a stay of his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The Court noted that the software rights were licensed “in bits” which Lord Walker commented was only a little less unreal than a syndicate owning undivided shares in a race horse partitioning the animal just before a race so that “one member takes the head and neck, and another the off-hind leg, and so on”); and the terms of the individual members’ loan financing were also relevant and, in particular, the likelihood of such loans ever being… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
As we’ve previously noted, the House of Lords in Doherty did little to actually make things clear, so Hillingdon v Collins is an important judgment. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
The judgment of Hildyard J in Southward Housing Co-Operative Ltd v Walker and Hay [2015] EWHC 1615 (Ch) falls in to the latter category, made all the more odd that it took nearly five months to hand down the decision. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
One of Marshall's loves was a dancer named Lady Walker. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
Here's what happened in the case management session -- and the hearing itself gets a mention below.From food porn to porn with food: the case of PornHub and Parmigiano ReggianoMany people enjoy sprinkling a little Parmesan cheese over their spaghetti bolognese. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:14 am
The basic framework was set out by the Supreme Court last year in the case of Walker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 7:54 am
Because the Supreme Court made the guidelines voluntary in January 2005, in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:30 am
He may not be guaranteed victory in court, but if there are such issues than a takedown is ill-advised, especially following recent rulings in the Lenz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Next Steps in the United States There is little doubt that, at some point, Perry v Schwarzenegger will end up in front of the US Supreme Court for a final analysis. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:03 pm
Walker, 574 U. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:43 am
" This language derives from Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
For more on this case, see Chris Walker's post on Notice & Comment. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
” Auer deference—which came from the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” In Gravel v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:34 am
” All told, the Second Circuit’s modifications make it just a little harder for defendants to qualify for the nominative use case. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
With a little over a year until California votes on AG, LegalPad expects many more of these to come. [read post]
