Search for: "Littles v. Area Health De v. Board*"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Case Name: Yvonne Fowkes v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
Beyond its fundamental importance to the scientific community in general, peer review is, said Professor Turok, of critical importance to the maintenance of high standards, and to the health and reputation of the field of theoretical physics. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Under the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
L’expérience américaine du contrôle judiciaire de la constitutionnalité des lois (Paris, Marcel Giard & Cie., 1921. 276 pp.). [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In 2015, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
(Ibid., pp. 28-29).This is not to suggest that the normative principles of the UNGP have very little potential for regulatory transposition. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Professional Reliance v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
” Tullis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The lawsuit alleged that the EPA’s TMDL intrudes upon land use, an area of state jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The lawsuit alleged that the EPA’s TMDL intrudes upon land use, an area of state jurisdiction. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
WSAIT Decision No. 2157/09 (Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Tribunal) Most labour and employment lawyers do not practice workers’ compensation, and know very little about the area beyond the basic principles. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:51 am
D.P.P. v. [read post]
