Search for: "Littles v. Area Health De v. Board*"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Additionally, pursuant to paragraph 4.2.1 of SPM CG-1, the board of authorized institutions should be composed of board members who possess a range of knowledge and experience in relevant areas and varied backgrounds to promote a diversity of views. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
For instance, in Canada, as Paul Daly powerfully shows, deference is recognized in many areas of the law and was entrenched and affirmed in a recent canonical judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court (called Vavilov). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
For instance, in Canada, as Paul Daly powerfully shows, deference is recognized in many areas of the law and was entrenched and affirmed in a recent canonical judgment of the Canadian Supreme Court (called Vavilov). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Case Name: Yvonne Fowkes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
For the second year in a row, the “Electronic Technology and Technology Services” and “Health Technology and Services” sectors represented over half of all filings (54%). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Claims for disability by individuals with little or no work experience increased by 29% over the same time. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
But service model innovation is necessary and hard across the board, including for law departments. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Robust public engagement will be critical—particularly for documenting specific harmful business practices and their prevalence, the magnitude and extent of the resulting consumer harm, the efficacy or shortcomings of rules pursued in other jurisdictions, and how to assess which areas are or are not fruitful for FTC rulemaking. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v… [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Tell us a little about him and his influence on John. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
Tarah Wheeler is an information security executive, social scientist in the area of international conflict, author, and poker player. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In 2015, for example, in Phillips v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
In November, Toledo, Ohio-area health officials closed every school in the county while letting gyms, tanning salons, office buildings, and the Hollywood Casino stay open. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2020 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
To make things worse, the Mexican law does not provide even the inadequate protections the US version offers, such as an explicit, regular regulatory proceeding that creates exemptions for areas where the law is provably creating harms. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
(Ibid., pp. 28-29).This is not to suggest that the normative principles of the UNGP have very little potential for regulatory transposition. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
” Tullis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
