Search for: "Littles v. Superintendent" Results 1 - 20 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
Texas, was decided just two weeks prior to Brown, but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement:  Méndez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
The superintendent doesn’t look like a website operator, so he’s eligible for Section 230 protection only as an ICS “user” and the user prong of Section 230 has always been a little murky. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case asks when is someone a "prisoner" under the PLRA.The case is Gibson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:43 am
The Superintendent's interpretation of 11 NYCRR 65-3.9(c) is additionally consistent with the spirit and purpose of the No-Fault Law (see generally Matter of ATM One v Landaverde, 2 NY3d at 477). [read post]