Search for: "Liu v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 427
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Senior Litigation Associate Lori Liu, Senior Associate Spencer Wilson and Associate Ryan McGinley-Stempel joined RPLG’s numbers. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  China, the United States, and Russia are left to squander muscle as they will, always subject to the legitimating judgment of this superego. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo.Event ReportAsia Correspondent Tian Liu provides her first report on The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)'s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference in Amsterdam: Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2). [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
As explained below, and for the reasons stated in Justice Cuéllar’s dissent, the DNA Act violates the prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures in the California Constitution. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application in the cases of AXB v BXA and entered default judgment in the case of LJY v Persons Unknown. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with” (Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; see Washington Mut. [read post]