Search for: "Living Rivers Council v. State Water Resources Control Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
On appeal before the California Supreme Court the first time, the court remanded the case back to the Court of Appeal for the court to reconsider the case in light of Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Bd., (December 15, 2021) 2021 Cal.App.LEXIS 1052. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY State Water Resources Control Board Issues Curtailment Orders Following Drought Conditions In The State. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Late in October 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom removed one of the directors for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board who was most vocally opposed to the project. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
He felt that petitioner did not make a rational choice to kill, but felt compelled to act as he did and for a short time lost control. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
This measure only had a short-lived positive effect. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
