Search for: "Living Rivers Council v. State Water Resources Control Board"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
In its appeal, Navistar charged that EPA is using those policies to allow SCR-equipped diesel powered trucks to operate for extended periods without any control of NOx emissions and is certifying SCR engines as meeting NOx emission requirements when they do not. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
He felt that petitioner did not make a rational choice to kill, but felt compelled to act as he did and for a short time lost control. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
They jumped with a live rock band, pedaled stationary bikes on display and gazed at a 65-foot rotating globe. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Plaintiff filed a deadline suit to compel the Administrator to take final action under section 110(k) of the Act on Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) Rules 800 through 806 submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the California Air Resources Board as revisions to the state implementation plan. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
This measure only had a short-lived positive effect. [read post]
