Search for: "Llamas v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Board agreed: “The repetition of the llama on the specimen in varying sizes, portions and vividity detracts from Applicant’s claim that the single llama depicted in its drawing would be recognized as its mark. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:35 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Geren, and its interpretation of treaties, as in Sanchez-Llamas, Abbott v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:09 am by SHG
The 2d Circuit has affirmed the district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm by Marie Louise
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg)   United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Specifically, under the heading of “Copyrights and AI-generated Content,” the FTC states the following: Conduct that may violate the copyright laws––such as training an AI tool on protected expression without the creator’s consent or selling output generated from such an AI tool, including by mimicking the creator’s writing style, vocal or instrumental performance, or likeness—may also constitute an unfair method of competition or an unfair or… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
" The latter point, Texas argued, was settled in the Court's decision last Term in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am by CodeX
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm by Marie Louise
nostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury (IPKat) ECJ rules on scope of fair compensation for private copying exceptions: Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Authores y Editores de España (SGAE) Case C-467/08 (JIPLP) India Patentability of method/process claims- Application of recent US case law to the Indian Patent Act section 3(k) (Spicy IP) Ireland Ireland joins copyright review queue (IPKat) Netherlands Court… [read post]