Search for: "Locke v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:03 am
Fishing, LLC, (Fishermen’s) appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:41 am
New Commerce Secretary: Gary Locke. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Local Ad Link v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
The Secretary of State’s justification for the situation is two-fold. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:22 pm
I'm not sure that Sandy's got this locked down. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
The alien can be detained – locked up in a holding facility – while his case is processed. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:13 am
An intriguing headline at Snopes.The since-rescinded memo, sent from the VA Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations, stated that photo should be removed on the grounds that it depicted a non-consensual kiss: "This memorandum requests the removal of the 'V-J Day in Times Square' photograph from all Veterans Health Administration facilities in alignment with the Department of Veterans Affairs' commitment to maintaining a… [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am
Locke's "wild Indian" in United States Supreme Court jurisprudence. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Jody Hice, who has embraced Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him, replaces Brad Raffensperger as Georgia’s secretary of state, Hice cannot contravene the basic principle of Bush v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
Supreme Court — including Korematsu v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
Secretary of Labor v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
In his remarks before thousands of employees on the USPTO campus, Secretary Locke said "David is taking on a big job… Promoting and protecting U.S. [...]...Federal Circuit to Rehear Tafas and GSK v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
The dissenting opinion also does not engage the majority opinion’s reliance on a state case called Luse v. [read post]
