Search for: "Locke v. Sparks" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am by Michael C. Dorf
That case sparked controversy over whether and when movements can effectively bring about policy change through litigation strategies. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:48 am by Michael Geist
CAIP decision and successfully fighting for fair dealing in the 2012 SOCAN v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
Recent officer-involved shootings and public allegations of police misconduct have sparked legal discussion around accountability for law enforcement. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
 - United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
” And indeed, reports that Trump might make such a declaration has sparked fears of authoritarian takeover by a president who wears his authoritarian impulses on his sleeve. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am by Ben
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
(https://www.blacklocks.ca)Blacklock’s will be back in the Federal Court tomorrow on December 12, 2018 at 90 Sparks St. in Ottawa at 9:30 AM with a “mega” motion record of almost 3,000 pages. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm by John Floyd
  It was a frightening time for hundreds of men, who had no ties to terrorism, but were locked up and abused for months at a time. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
There has already been an interesting case challenging Illinois divestment legislation (National Foreign Trade Council v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm by Daithí
  In general academic terms, I hope that it will spark a debate on freedom of expression of the nature that the author notes in the US (on democracy and discourse) in the footnotes to p 13. [read post]