Search for: "Lockhart v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 am
Indeed, the Sixth Circuit specifically held as much in a well-known 1992 case, United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
They point to Lockhart v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
They each had dual citizenship in the United States and Canada. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
") SC17773 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:06 am
Lockhart, Comment, Oliver v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:39 pm
On Wednesday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
Lockhart, yet no “flood” of challenges followed that ruling. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:23 am
The first is in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Further, since the USAG has not issued regulations as to cases like these, a real question of whether a retroactive application is permissible or a ex post facto violation.7-30-2008 Ohio:DAYTON, Ohio -- A United States District Court Judge in Dayton has upheld the constitutionality of the 2006 federal law used to punish sex offenders who fail to register.Gregory Lockhart, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, and James Wahlrab,… [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
