Search for: "Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1132, 1149 (2003) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:07 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134 (2003), did not preclude an award of restitution under California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL") to plaintiff by defendant Microsoft even though plaintiff paid a retailer, not Microsoft, for the product. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1150 [UCL provides equitable avenue for prevention of unfair business practices, with streamlined procedures and limited remedies].) [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1152 (2003) (“nonrestituionary disgorgement of profits is not an available remedy . . . under the UCL”). [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:30 am
The court evaluated the evidence presented in the trial court and did not change the standards for class certification, citing Lockheed Martin Corp.[ v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1148) and they should not be sufficient to confer standing. [read post]