Search for: "Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1144.) [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1132, 1149 (2003) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:07 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134 (2003), did not preclude an award of restitution under California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL") to plaintiff by defendant Microsoft even though plaintiff paid a retailer, not Microsoft, for the product. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1150; Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1150; Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:25 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1150 [UCL provides equitable avenue for prevention of unfair business practices, with streamlined procedures and limited remedies].) [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:50 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1152 (2003) (“nonrestituionary disgorgement of profits is not an available remedy . . . under the UCL”). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
(Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:02 am
Superior Court [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:58 pm
” (Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:52 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1267, 1283 []; Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 139 Cal.Rptr.3d 315, 273 P.3d 513 (Cal.2012). [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:30 am
The court evaluated the evidence presented in the trial court and did not change the standards for class certification, citing Lockheed Martin Corp.[ v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2000) 82 Cal. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal. 4th 1134, 1148. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:04 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 592, 608.) [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1148) and they should not be sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
(Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]