Search for: "Lofgren v. Lofgren"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 8:58 am
Disclosure v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Lofgren’s initiative is a focused legal corrective. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
First things first: the opinion in Golan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
* U.S. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Sen. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:37 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
ZOE LOFGREN of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 17, United States Code, to promote innovation, to encourage the introduction of new technology, to enhance library preservation efforts, and to protect the fair use rights of consumers, and for other purposes. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 3:42 pm
In this week's case (Bidgood v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Representatives Howard Berman, Barney Frank, Zoe Lofgren and George Miller (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-440 Case name: Rothgery v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:23 am
Zoe Lofgren has stepped up. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
Zoe Lofgren. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
Pirri: Barnes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:43 pm
Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:25 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
Zoe Lofgren). [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:36 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:43 pm
Our flagship lawsuit against mass surveillance Jewel v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
