Search for: "Logic Leasing v. Administrative Inf*"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Discerning majority-supported rules is like doing a logic puzzle for the LSAT. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
” Here, the Biden administration agrees to Payne’s request for vacatur, although it opposes Payne’s additional request for further consideration in light of Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
Save Our Access v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:38 am
Maloney to consider whether members of Congress can sue to force disclosure of information from the General Services Administration. ] Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carnahan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state, then, in a markets privileging environment is caught on the horns of potentially incompatible objectives: the convergence of economic and administrative collectives around notions of compliance and state duty; or the promotion of risk taking in economic ventures to create prosperity and enhance the production of value that can then be tapped for all kinds of purposes. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
Now, that leisurely divergence is likely to get upended because during the, blink and you missed it, Liz Truss Administration, the government published draft legislation to revoke at the end of 2023 all Retained EU Laws except any which might be chosen to be explicitly preserved. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
For instance, in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:21 pm
The case, renamed Biden v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 6:16 am
Town of Huntington, N.Y. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
Manage notes logically, link notes to each other, and even export notes to draft a term sheet. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Invoking the protections of res judicata, collateral estoppel and the requirement to exhaust administrative remedies as analyzed in Ione Valley Land, Air, & Water Defense Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, in Torres v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Co., LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
As the City’s ordinance did not give the City authority to mitigate environmental impacts not otherwise associated with design features, the appellate court ruled that the exemption was appropriate, following the logic in Bowman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
Convergence Employee Leasing III, Inc., (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), the Employer/Carrier (E/C) were not entitled to the presumption due to their non-compliance with the collection and chain of custody procedures set forth in the administrative rules. [read post]
