Search for: "Lollis v. S & S Construction"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
In response to the contention by ECUSA's attorney, Mary Kostel, that the Court's ruling as to who owned the property was "clear", Judge Dickson responded: "We would not be here if it was clear. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
In response to the contention by ECUSA's attorney, Mary Kostel, that the Court's ruling as to who owned the property was "clear", Judge Dickson responded: "We would not be here if it was clear. [read post]
