Search for: "Lolly v. State"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United States Supreme… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United States Supreme… [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:25 am
Witness Jule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel for Copyright Microsoft Corporation, noted the decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:03 am
Lolli-Ghetti v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
Lollie v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:04 am
In Lolly v Brookdale Hosp. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am
§ 893.117, both first degree misdemeanors.After the misdemeanor charges were filed, the State has only 90 days to bring the case to trial unless the defendant waives her rights to a speedy trial. [read post]