Search for: "Long Beach Area, et al v. City of Long Beach"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, et al. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
City of Newport Beach (Newport Banning Ranch LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 3, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 2399347. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:01 am
United States of America, et al., U.S.D.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
It was Campa, et al., v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
First East Village Associates, et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
City of Sebastopol (Dec. 2, 2009, No. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
City of Long Beach, et al., Xavier Becerra (Attorney General, as Intervener) v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
” (City of Long Beach v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
City of Watsonville, et al. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1059: A city acting as its own ALUC is subject to all of the substantive requirements under the State Aeronautics Act. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
Forestry Service, et al.; Great Falls Snowmobile Club, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
City of Manhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Manhattan Beach). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
City of Santee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City and County of San Francisco (Forest City California Residential Development, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2019) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
” (Citing Guidelines § 15130(a) and City of Long Beach v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
While ABX1 27 may force cities to make tough decisions, it does not mandate any payment and, according to the State, is not prohibited by Proposition 22. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
While ABX1 27 may force cities to make tough decisions, it does not mandate any payment and, according to the State, is not prohibited by Proposition 22. [read post]