Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
I'm about 25 pages into the 190+ page (including dissents) Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 7:30 am
Software patents have a long history in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
So, the long-awaited Supreme Court argument in Skilling v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Citizens United overruled long time federal regulations of corporate campaign financing. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
In fact, corporations are free to make campaign contributions so long as they solicit them from employees and shareholders, then pass them on to candidates via separate, transparent accounts, and file two simple forms with the state.When Montana’s state’s supreme court upheld the law, ATP asked the Supreme Court of the United States to stay the decision, effectively granting an injunction. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
The Court is expected to release its long awaited opinions in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:13 pm
United States, 212 U.S. 481 (1909); United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
United States</em>? [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:56 am
Menasha Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and parts of McConnell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the United States and the United Kingdom lack a a specific statute on corporate groups and are assumed to adopt an “entity centric” approach to corporate law, these countries have led the way in increasing entity transparency in the field. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
It will be a long time (if ever) before the Court reverses Buckley v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
By contrast, Citizens United allowed corporations to spend whatever they wished, so long as they did it independently of any candidate or political party. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:21 pm
Citizens United held that the fact that a speaker was a corporation could not deprive it of the right to endorse candidates by making independent expenditures that individuals had long since been held to have. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
United States, No. 22-CV-0078 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Hawaii, which upheld Donald Trump's anti-Muslim travel ban, and Citizens United v. [read post]
