Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 81 - 100 of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 1:06 pm by Gerard Magliocca
 It’s been a long time since a state supreme court has so brazenly tried to evade a U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:12 pm
Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm by Christine Hurt
  To me, today's routing of the use of this statute in corporate fraud is a symbolic reversal of the body of Enron Task Force prosecutions. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that general-jurisdiction-by-registration statutes do not violate the Due Process Clause. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Regulation is becoming an increasingly important factor for United States businesses. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
The Corporate Veil: Corporate law is, for the most part, a creature of state law. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:17 am
Although the Meso Scale Diagnostics decision confirms, at least under Delaware law, the long-standing view of many practitioners that a reverse triangular merger does not result in an assignment by operation of law, it does not directly affect the contrary position taken by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in SQL Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  The decision requires twenty-four states to repeal their bans on corporate and union advertising; as states repeal these laws, Baran reasoned, they might concurrently strengthen their reporting and disclosure laws. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm by Sophia Cope
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law.  [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
 In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm by admin
Even the dissenting John Paul Stevens conceded that the Court has long held that corporations are covered by the First Amendment. [read post]