Search for: "Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 1,379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
WHY THE CURRENT FEDERAL EFFORTS WON’T TAKE THE SPOTLIGHT OFF FIDUCIARIES ANYTIME SOON. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Circuit Court of Appeals opinion from 1969, Community Blood Bank of Kansas City Area, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
He said he proposed the amendment in reaction to the refusal by the FRBKC to provide Congress with any information about its decision to deny, then approve and then revoke a master acc [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
The 1977 decision, which was recently reaffirmed in the high court’s 2019 holding in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In essence, companies won’t always provide investors important information, even if it is worth it to investors. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even if not required to satisfy copyright claims, there's long term value (as well as fundamental fairness) in compensating artists who invented the works (including the concepts underlying the work) and undertook the risks, time, and other expense in bringing them into existence. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Jeffrey T. Dinwoodie
Coinbase, Inc., No. 23-cv-4738 (S.D.N.Y., filed Aug. 4, 2023); Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 231, 232, and 240 (1988) (holding that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider the information important in deciding how to vote or make an investment decision; and quoting TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]