Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 1 - 20
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The absence of supportive epidemiology was excused with hand waving that there was a “credible” mechanism, and that epidemiology took too long and was too expensive. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2018), Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
What if you were deploying HAL from 2001: Space Odyssey[15] or Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Starting on January 9th, the parties pleaded their case revolving around the decade-long legal battle between Bouvier and Rybolovlev, and Sotheby’s alleged involvement. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of AppealFees: Fees are charged for this event from £8 - £35. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:22 am
Oh, how times have changed.The US Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v MercExchange (2006) meant patents were no longer exclusive rights by definition and the implications and wisdom of that shift have been vigorously debated. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
In so doing, and while in the end the result was ultimately the same, i.e. that the GUIs in question would be original, Arnold LJ made some key points (para 24), including that the test of originality is an objective one, and is not one of artistic merit.CommentAside from the specific factual circumstances, the judgment in THJ is important for the following reasons.First, despite Brexit and the power of senior courts to ‘depart’ from CJEU case law, lacking a statutory reform,… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Arnold LJ spent the most of his judgment considering the impact of the 10+ years of coexistence, but still concluded that the judge was alive to this and it was for him to decide how much or how little weight to give it. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Science Policy (1990); Arnold S. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
Amongst the marks owned by easyGroup is a registration for EASYLIFE against a long list of goods, 434 to be precise; yes, this Kat counted! [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:52 am
Amgen v Sanofi, IPKat). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Accordingly, as recently summarised by Lord Justice Arnold, the three key considerations for claim interpretation in the UK are 1) the wording of the claim, 2) the context provided by the specification and 3) the inventor’s purpose (InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 105). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
