Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 21 - 40 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”Apotex’s Second ClaimIn his earlier judgment in Lilly v 8PM, Arnold J had held that the ex turpi causa rule applied where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss claimed. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am by Rose Hughes
In Sandoz v BMS, Arnold LJ considered G 2/21 in the context of the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:21 am by CMS
In this post, Grant Arnold, a paralegal in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 902 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 in the case concerning the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 1:53 pm
The case is U.S. v Arnold, No. 06-50581, D.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:50 pm by Andres
In Paramount Home Entertainment International Ltd & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 3479 (Ch), Arnold J is adding to the now long list of blocked torrent tracker sites in the UK, a list that includes Newzbin, The Pirate Bay, H33t, Torrentz, Torrent Reactor, and many others. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Eleonora Rosati
In so doing, and while in the end the result was ultimately the same, i.e. that the GUIs in question would be original, Arnold LJ made some key points (para 24), including that the test of originality is an objective one, and is not one of artistic merit.CommentAside from the specific factual circumstances, the judgment in THJ is important for the following reasons.First, despite Brexit and the power of senior courts to ‘depart’ from CJEU case law, lacking a statutory reform,… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am by Andrew Trask
As you probably know, on Wednesday, the Supreme Court finally issued its long-awaited opinion in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
  Under California divorce law, a ten-year-long marriage is considered a “marriage of long duration. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Does adultery affect my divorce case? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Long may they continue.Missed opportunity of the year – McDonald’s v Supermac – This was a case deemed so unfortunate that it deserved a category of its own. [read post]