Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 21 - 40
of 598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Accordingly, as recently summarised by Lord Justice Arnold, the three key considerations for claim interpretation in the UK are 1) the wording of the claim, 2) the context provided by the specification and 3) the inventor’s purpose (InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 105). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
In Sandoz v BMS, Arnold LJ considered G 2/21 in the context of the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
Unlike the EPO, Lord Justice Arnold (Arnold LJ) in Sandoz v BMS considers the "plausibility" of a non-claimed technical effect under the heading of inventive step and sufficiency. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Reserved Judgments Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) Smith v Backhouse, heard on 11 July 2023 (Asplin, Arnold and [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
While this was a partial victory for the Band, its attorney Erick Arnold expressed concern that the damages were not enough to prevent other oil companies from trespassing on Tribal land and said: “the three-year timeline leaves the Bad River vulnerable to catastrophe, and there is no warrant for allowing Enbridge’s trespass to continue for that long. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Tax Court held in Martin Ice Cream Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
Arnold, J. (2022, January 6). [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:21 am
In this post, Grant Arnold, a paralegal in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
For a long time platforms have benefited from a fairly generous set of limitations of liability that some rightsholders would argue allows them to profit from infringement. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
—Danielle Steel 1Franatovich v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Arnold, 107 N.C. 861, 11 S.E. 990, 990 (1890); cf. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
From Sharpe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
Long before Section 404 arrived on the scene, there was already Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, which was enacted by Congress in 1977. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Arnold LJ remarked during the Appeal hearing that “the purpose of sanctions for non-use will be undermined if they can be circumvented by evergreening. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
The Judge followed Birss J’s approach to that question in Pfizer v Hoffmann-La Rochebut as Arnold LJ concluded above, helping a foreign court decide an issue under its own law is not a reason to grant declaratory relief ([63] – [64]). [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
However, with reference to the decision in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, the court considered that it is not its job to rescue a tenant from an “imprudent term” in a lease. [read post]
