Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 61 - 80 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:51 am by Hayleigh Bosher
The answer, Arnold illustrates, is found in the performance, rather than the person. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
A decision of Mr Justice Arnold issued this week in the Patents Court. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:27 am by Jani Ihalainen
After long negotiations no license agreement was finalized, but a preliminary version of the documentary was made by Mr Hunt, and advertised on a website for the UK market. [read post]
In the wake of the UK High Court’s earlier ruling on the long-running SkyKick saga (following the CJEU’s decision), Lord Justice Arnold has, in his latest ruling, considered which party should bear the costs of the dispute, amongst other outstanding issues. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:49 pm
The IPKat noted here the decision of Mr Justice Arnold last May in L'Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am by J
Which brings me to Arnold v Britton [2013] EWCA Civ 902. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am by J
Which brings me to Arnold v Britton [2013] EWCA Civ 902. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am by Rose Hughes
Unlike the EPO, Lord Justice Arnold (Arnold LJ) in Sandoz v BMS considers the "plausibility" of a non-claimed technical effect under the heading of inventive step and sufficiency. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Back in December 2008 Mr Justice Arnold delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 7:49 am by Andres
I finally managed to read the latest (and hopefully last) instalment of the long legal saga that is SAS Institute v World Programming Ltd. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Jani Ihalainen
The case of England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd v Tixdaq Ltd dealt with an app called Fanatix, which, among providing sports news, allowed for its users to record clips (up to 8 seconds long) using their smartphones or tablets, and sharing them with like-minded sports fans who might not be able to follow the action live (encapsulating mostly the 'highlights' of an event). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:10 am by Jani
".Applying the conditions to the case Justice Arnold quickly saw that all of the requirements had been fulfilled. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
It's Shanks v Unilever Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 1647 (Pat), a Patents Court for England and Wales ruling of the indefatigable Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]